Back
RAND - Incentives for U.S.-China Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation
webCredibility Rating
4/5
High(4)High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: RAND Corporation
A RAND policy analysis relevant to AI governance researchers and policymakers concerned with how great-power competition shapes AGI development incentives and the prospects for international AI safety cooperation.
Metadata
Importance: 62/100organizational reportanalysis
Summary
This RAND report analyzes the strategic dynamics between the U.S. and China in the context of artificial general intelligence development, identifying key national security scenarios where competition, conflict, or cooperation may emerge. It examines five distinct national security problem areas to map out incentive structures that could drive bilateral behavior around AGI. The report highlights both the risks of an AGI arms race and potential pathways for cooperative risk management.
Key Points
- •Examines five national security problem areas where U.S.-China AGI dynamics could manifest as conflict, competition, or cooperation.
- •Identifies incentive structures that may push both nations toward competitive or cooperative stances on AGI development.
- •Highlights risks of an AGI arms race and how competitive pressures could undermine safety considerations.
- •Explores potential frameworks for U.S.-China coordination to manage shared AGI-related national security risks.
- •Published by RAND, a major policy research institution, lending credibility to its geopolitical and strategic assessments.
Review
This RAND Corporation analysis offers a nuanced exploration of how the United States and China might navigate the emerging landscape of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The authors argue that while strategic rivalry creates strong incentives for competition, there are also critical areas where cooperation could be mutually beneficial and even necessary to mitigate existential risks.
The study systematically examines five 'hard national security problems' related to AGI: wonder weapons, systemic power shifts, WMD proliferation, artificial agency, and potential instability. By mapping out potential scenarios of conflict, competition, and cooperation, the research provides a sophisticated framework for understanding the geopolitical challenges of transformative AI. The authors emphasize that deliberate diplomatic efforts will be essential to manage potential risks, suggesting Track 1.5 dialogues, expert working groups, and incremental confidence-building measures as potential pathways to productive engagement.
Cited by 2 pages
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Timing Windows | Analysis | 72.0 |
| Governance-Focused Worldview | Concept | 67.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 9, 202628 KB
Incentives for U.S.-China Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation Across Artificial General Intelligence’s Five Hard National Security Problems | RAND
Jan
FEB
Mar
22
2025
2026
2027
success
fail
About this capture
COLLECTED BY
Collection: Save Page Now Outlinks
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20260222185814/https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4189-1.html
Skip to page content
Toggle Menu
Site-wide navigation
Topics
Trending
International Economic Relations
Artificial Intelligence
Middle East
Military Recruitment
School Safety
Topics
Children, Families, and Communities
Cyber and Data Sciences
Education and Literacy
Energy and Environment
Health, Health Care, and Aging
Homeland Security and Public Safety
Infrastructure and Transportation
International Affairs
Law and Business
National Security
Science and Technology
Social Equity
Workers and the Workplace
All Topics
Research & Commentary
Experts
About
Research Divisions
RAND's divisions conduct research on a uniquely broad front for clients around the globe.
U.S. research divisions
RAND Army Research Division
RAND Education, Employment, and Infrastructure
RAND Global and Emerging Risks
RAND Health
RAND Homeland Security Research Division
RAND National Security Research Division
RAND Project AIR FORCE
International research divisions
RAND Australia
RAND Europe
Services & Impact
Careers
Graduate School
Subscribe
Give
Cart
Toggle Search
Search termsSubmit
RAND
Research & Commentary
Expert Insights
PE-A4189-1
Incentives for U.S.-China Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation Across Artificial General Intelligence’s Five Hard National Security Problems
Michael S. Chase, William Marcellino
Expert InsightsPublished Aug 4, 2025
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share on Facebook
Email
In a relationship marked by strategic rivalry and mutual suspicion, the prospect of either the United States or the People’s Republic of China (PRC)—or both—achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) is likely to heighten tensions and could even increase the risk of competition spiraling into conflict.[1] This is unsurprising, as AGI could reshape the global balance of power or yield “wonder weapons” capable of overwhelming intelligence systems, information ecosystems, and cyber defenses (Mitre and Predd, 2025).
Yet the emergence of AGI could also create incentives for risk reduction and cooperation. We argue that both will not only be possible but e
... (truncated, 28 KB total)Resource ID:
ab22aa0df9b1be7b | Stable ID: sid_8liUF0EGcm