AI Value Lock-in
lock-inriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/lock-in/
E189Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "lock-in",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/lock-in/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/lock-in.mdx",
"title": "AI Value Lock-in",
"quality": 64,
"readerImportance": 15.5,
"researchImportance": 20,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": "outcome",
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Comprehensive analysis of AI lock-in scenarios where values, systems, or power structures become permanently entrenched. Documents evidence including Big Tech's 66-70% cloud control, AI surveillance in 80+ countries, 34% global surveillance market share by Chinese firms, and recent AI deceptive behaviors (Claude 3 Opus strategic answering, o1 goal-guarding). Identifies six intervention pathways and quantifies timeline (5-20 year critical window) and likelihood (15-40%).",
"description": "This page analyzes how AI could enable permanent entrenchment of values, systems, or power structures. Evidence includes Big Tech controlling 66-70% of cloud computing, AI surveillance deployed in 80+ countries, and documented AI deceptive behaviors. The IMD AI Safety Clock stands at 20 minutes to midnight as of September 2025.",
"ratings": {
"novelty": 4.2,
"rigor": 6.8,
"actionability": 5.5,
"completeness": 7.5
},
"category": "risks",
"subcategory": "structural",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 3500,
"tableCount": 5,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 123,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.32,
"sectionCount": 45,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 11
},
"suggestedQuality": 73,
"updateFrequency": 45,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 3500,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 107,
"backlinkCount": 30,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 60,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources"
]
},
"entityType": "risk",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 23,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "irreversibility",
"title": "AI-Induced Irreversibility",
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/irreversibility/",
"similarity": 23
},
{
"id": "structural-risks",
"title": "AI Structural Risk Cruxes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/structural-risks/",
"similarity": 21
},
{
"id": "self-improvement",
"title": "Self-Improvement and Recursive Enhancement",
"path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/self-improvement/",
"similarity": 20
},
{
"id": "authoritarian-tools-diffusion",
"title": "Authoritarian Tools Diffusion Model",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/authoritarian-tools-diffusion/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "agentic-ai",
"title": "Agentic AI",
"path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/agentic-ai/",
"similarity": 18
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 7,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 14,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 28,
"externalLinks": 18,
"footnotes": 11,
"references": 11
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 5,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 123,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 66,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "amber",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:6.8 A:5.5 C:7.5"
},
"readerRank": 552,
"researchRank": 489,
"recommendedScore": 157.61
}External Links
{
"eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/lock-in",
"eightyK": "https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/extreme-power-concentration/"
}Backlinks (30)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| structural-risks | AI Structural Risk Cruxes | crux | — |
| lock-in-mechanisms | Lock-in Mechanisms Model | analysis | — |
| concentration-of-power-model | Concentration of Power Systems Model | analysis | consequence |
| lock-in-model | Lock-in Irreversibility Model | analysis | analyzes |
| authoritarian-tools | AI Authoritarian Tools | risk | — |
| concentration-of-power | AI-Driven Concentration of Power | risk | — |
| enfeeblement | AI-Induced Enfeeblement | risk | — |
| irreversibility | AI-Induced Irreversibility | risk | — |
| authoritarian-takeover | AI-Enabled Authoritarian Takeover | risk | — |
| compute-concentration | Compute Concentration | risk | — |
| __index__/knowledge-base | Knowledge Base | concept | — |
| compounding-risks-analysis | Compounding Risks Analysis | analysis | — |
| epistemic-collapse-threshold | Epistemic Collapse Threshold Model | analysis | — |
| expertise-atrophy-progression | Expertise Atrophy Progression Model | analysis | — |
| instrumental-convergence-framework | Instrumental Convergence Framework | analysis | — |
| intervention-timing-windows | Intervention Timing Windows | analysis | — |
| irreversibility-threshold | Irreversibility Threshold Model | analysis | — |
| model-organisms-of-misalignment | Model Organisms of Misalignment | analysis | — |
| multipolar-trap-dynamics | Multipolar Trap Dynamics Model | analysis | — |
| racing-dynamics-impact | Racing Dynamics Impact Model | analysis | — |
| risk-cascade-pathways | Risk Cascade Pathways | analysis | — |
| technical-pathways | Technical Pathway Decomposition | analysis | — |
| toby-ord | Toby Ord | person | — |
| deliberation | AI-Assisted Deliberation Platforms | approach | — |
| pause | Pause Advocacy | approach | — |
| __index__/knowledge-base/risks | AI Risks | concept | — |
| knowledge-monopoly | AI Knowledge Monopoly | risk | — |
| structural-overview | Structural Risks (Overview) | concept | — |
| doomer | AI Doomer Worldview | concept | — |
| controlled-vocabulary | Controlled Vocabulary for Longtermist Analysis | concept | — |