Longterm Wiki

Proliferation

proliferationriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/proliferation/
E232Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page36 backlinksQuality: 60Updated: 2026-03-13
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "proliferation",
  "numericId": null,
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/proliferation/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/proliferation.mdx",
  "title": "Proliferation",
  "quality": 60,
  "readerImportance": 57,
  "researchImportance": 65.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "tractability": null,
  "neglectedness": null,
  "uncertainty": null,
  "causalLevel": "amplifier",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "llmSummary": "AI proliferation accelerated dramatically as the capability gap narrowed from 18 to 6 months (2022-2024), with open-source models like DeepSeek R1 now matching frontier performance. US export controls reduced China's compute share from 37% to 14% but failed to prevent capability parity through algorithmic innovation, leaving proliferation's net impact on safety deeply uncertain.",
  "description": "AI proliferation—the spread of capabilities from frontier labs to diverse actors—accelerated dramatically as the capability gap narrowed from 18 to 6 months (2022-2024). Open-source models like DeepSeek R1 now match frontier performance, while US export controls reduced China's compute share from 37% to 14% but failed to prevent capability parity through algorithmic innovation.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.5,
    "rigor": 6.5,
    "actionability": 5.5,
    "completeness": 7
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "structural",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 2390,
    "tableCount": 7,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 61,
    "externalLinks": 38,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.2,
    "sectionCount": 34,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 2390,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "Qwen overtook Llama in downloads 2025",
      "url": "https://www.red-line.ai/p/state-of-open-source-ai-2025",
      "resourceId": "42b42eecf63e696b",
      "resourceTitle": "open-source models closed to within 1.70%"
    },
    {
      "text": "State of AI Report",
      "url": "https://www.stateof.ai",
      "resourceId": "f09a58f2760fb69b",
      "resourceTitle": "State of AI Report 2025"
    },
    {
      "text": "Red Line AI",
      "url": "https://www.red-line.ai/p/state-of-open-source-ai-2025",
      "resourceId": "42b42eecf63e696b",
      "resourceTitle": "open-source models closed to within 1.70%"
    },
    {
      "text": "International AI Safety Report",
      "url": "https://internationalaisafetyreport.org/publication/first-key-update-capabilities-and-risk-implications",
      "resourceId": "6acf3be7a03c2328",
      "resourceTitle": "International AI Safety Report (October 2025)"
    },
    {
      "text": "Overtook LLaMA in total downloads by mid-2025",
      "url": "https://www.red-line.ai/p/state-of-open-source-ai-2025",
      "resourceId": "42b42eecf63e696b",
      "resourceTitle": "open-source models closed to within 1.70%"
    },
    {
      "text": "the gap narrowing to just 1.7% on some benchmarks by 2025",
      "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report",
      "resourceId": "da87f2b213eb9272",
      "resourceTitle": "Stanford AI Index 2025"
    },
    {
      "text": "30% of Python code written by US open-source contributors was AI-generated in 2024",
      "url": "https://internationalaisafetyreport.org/publication/first-key-update-capabilities-and-risk-implications",
      "resourceId": "6acf3be7a03c2328",
      "resourceTitle": "International AI Safety Report (October 2025)"
    },
    {
      "text": "Mean downloaded model size increased from 827M to 20.8B parameters (2023-2025)",
      "url": "https://www.red-line.ai/p/state-of-open-source-ai-2025",
      "resourceId": "42b42eecf63e696b",
      "resourceTitle": "open-source models closed to within 1.70%"
    },
    {
      "text": "Trump administration rescinds AI Diffusion Rule",
      "url": "https://www.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-announces-rescission-biden-era-artificial-intelligence-diffusion-rule-strengthens",
      "resourceId": "b6939175cd95cd38",
      "resourceTitle": "BIS - Department of Commerce Announces Rescission of Biden-Era AI Diffusion Rule"
    },
    {
      "text": "Huawei will produce only 200,000 AI chips in 2025, while Nvidia produces 4-5 million",
      "url": "https://www.cfr.org/article/chinas-ai-chip-deficit-why-huawei-cant-catch-nvidia-and-us-export-controls-should-remain",
      "resourceId": "fe41a8475bafc188",
      "resourceTitle": "China's AI Chip Deficit: Why Huawei Can't Catch Nvidia"
    },
    {
      "text": "DeepSeek R1 generated CBRN info \"that can't be found on Google\"",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com",
      "resourceId": "afe2508ac4caf5ee",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic"
    },
    {
      "text": "Open-weight models closed the performance gap from 8% to 1.7% on some benchmarks in a single year",
      "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report",
      "resourceId": "da87f2b213eb9272",
      "resourceTitle": "Stanford AI Index 2025"
    },
    {
      "text": "China's AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 (Sep 2024)",
      "url": "https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/10/how-china-views-ai-risks-and-what-to-do-about-them",
      "resourceId": "4f75d2d6d47e8531",
      "resourceTitle": "AI governance framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "China-based models diverge on safety",
      "url": "https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/10/how-china-views-ai-risks-and-what-to-do-about-them",
      "resourceId": "4f75d2d6d47e8531",
      "resourceTitle": "AI governance framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "China's AI Safety Framework diverges from Western approaches",
      "url": "https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/10/how-china-views-ai-risks-and-what-to-do-about-them",
      "resourceId": "4f75d2d6d47e8531",
      "resourceTitle": "AI governance framework"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 15,
  "convertedLinkCount": 58,
  "backlinkCount": 36,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 55,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 17,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "large-language-models",
        "title": "Large Language Models",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/large-language-models/",
        "similarity": 17
      },
      {
        "id": "proliferation-risk-model",
        "title": "AI Proliferation Risk Model",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/proliferation-risk-model/",
        "similarity": 17
      },
      {
        "id": "self-improvement",
        "title": "Self-Improvement and Recursive Enhancement",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/self-improvement/",
        "similarity": 16
      },
      {
        "id": "structural-risks",
        "title": "AI Structural Risk Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/structural-risks/",
        "similarity": 16
      },
      {
        "id": "open-vs-closed",
        "title": "Open vs Closed Source AI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/debates/open-vs-closed/",
        "similarity": 16
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 8,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 10,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 19,
      "externalLinks": 12,
      "footnotes": 7,
      "references": 7
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 7,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 61,
      "externalLinks": 38,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 61,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "llmSummary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "green",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:6.5 A:5.5 C:7"
  },
  "readerRank": 255,
  "researchRank": 184,
  "recommendedScore": 170.23
}
External Links
{
  "eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/proliferation"
}
Backlinks (36)
idtitletyperelationship
proliferation-risk-modelAI Proliferation Risk Modelanalysisrelated
proliferation-modelAI Capability Proliferation Modelanalysisanalyzes
compute-governanceCompute Governancepolicy
coordination-techAI Governance Coordination Technologiesapproach
open-sourceOpen Source AI Safetyapproach
structured-accessStructured Access / API-Onlyapproach
ai-enabled-untraceable-misuseAI-Enabled Untraceable Misuserisk
scientific-researchScientific Research Capabilitiescapability
agi-developmentAGI Developmentconcept
autonomous-weapons-proliferationLAWS Proliferation Modelanalysis
bioweapons-attack-chainBioweapons Attack Chain Modelanalysis
capability-alignment-raceCapability-Alignment Race Modelanalysis
cyberweapons-attack-automationAutonomous Cyber Attack Timelineanalysis
multi-actor-landscapeMulti-Actor Strategic Landscapeanalysis
multipolar-trap-dynamicsMultipolar Trap Dynamics Modelanalysis
racing-dynamics-impactRacing Dynamics Impact Modelanalysis
risk-activation-timelineRisk Activation Timeline Modelanalysis
risk-interaction-matrixRisk Interaction Matrix Modelanalysis
short-timeline-policy-implicationsShort Timeline Policy Implicationsanalysis
conjectureConjectureorganization
meta-aiMeta AI (FAIR)organization
palisade-researchPalisade Researchorganization
rethink-prioritiesRethink Prioritiesorganization
securebioSecureBioorganization
jaan-tallinnJaan Tallinnperson
toby-ordToby Ordperson
california-sb53California SB 53policy
dangerous-cap-evalsDangerous Capability Evaluationsapproach
international-regimesInternational Compute Regimespolicy
autonomous-weaponsAutonomous Weaponsrisk
disinformationDisinformationrisk
irreversibilityAI-Induced Irreversibilityrisk
learned-helplessnessEpistemic Learned Helplessnessrisk
structural-overviewStructural Risks (Overview)concept
surveillanceMass Surveillancerisk
governance-focusedGovernance-Focused Worldviewconcept
Longterm Wiki