Longterm Wiki

Bioweapons

bioweaponsriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/bioweapons/
E42Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page33 backlinksQuality: 91Updated: 2026-03-13
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "bioweapons",
  "numericId": null,
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/bioweapons/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/bioweapons.mdx",
  "title": "Bioweapons",
  "quality": 91,
  "readerImportance": 62.5,
  "researchImportance": 24,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "tractability": null,
  "neglectedness": null,
  "uncertainty": null,
  "causalLevel": "outcome",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "llmSummary": "Comprehensive synthesis of AI-bioweapons evidence through early 2026, including the FRI expert survey finding 5x risk increase from AI capabilities (0.3% → 1.5% annual epidemic probability), Anthropic's ASL-3 activation for Claude Opus 4, and OpenAI's o3 reaching 94th percentile on virology tests. Key developments: DNA screening now catches 97% of threats post-patch, but open-source models (DeepSeek) lack safeguards. Expert consensus: safeguards can reduce risk nearly to baseline even with advanced AI capabilities.",
  "description": "AI-assisted biological weapon development represents one of the most severe near-term AI risks. In 2025, both OpenAI and Anthropic activated elevated safety measures after internal evaluations showed frontier models approaching expert-level biological capabilities, with OpenAI expecting next-gen models to hit 'high-risk' classification.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.5,
    "rigor": 6.8,
    "actionability": 6.2,
    "completeness": 7.5
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "misuse",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "biorisks",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 10802,
    "tableCount": 23,
    "diagramCount": 2,
    "internalLinks": 90,
    "externalLinks": 12,
    "footnoteCount": 56,
    "bulletRatio": 0.32,
    "sectionCount": 63,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 14
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 93,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 10802,
  "unconvertedLinks": [],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
  "convertedLinkCount": 62,
  "backlinkCount": 33,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 55,
    "factors": [
      "moderately-cited",
      "high-quality",
      "severe-truncation"
    ],
    "integrityIssues": [
      "severe-truncation"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 21,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "bioweapons-ai-uplift",
        "title": "AI Uplift Assessment Model",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/bioweapons-ai-uplift/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "scientific-research",
        "title": "Scientific Research Capabilities",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/scientific-research/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "authoritarian-tools-diffusion",
        "title": "Authoritarian Tools Diffusion Model",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/authoritarian-tools-diffusion/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "language-models",
        "title": "Large Language Models",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/language-models/",
        "similarity": 19
      },
      {
        "id": "why-alignment-hard",
        "title": "Why Alignment Might Be Hard",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/debates/why-alignment-hard/",
        "similarity": 19
      }
    ]
  },
  "changeHistory": [
    {
      "date": "2026-02-18",
      "branch": "claude/review-pr-216-P4Fcu",
      "title": "Fix audit report findings from PR #216",
      "summary": "Reviewed PR #216 (comprehensive wiki audit report) and implemented fixes for the major issues it identified: fixed 181 path-style EntityLink IDs across 33 files, converted 164 broken EntityLinks (referencing non-existent entities) to plain text across 38 files, fixed a temporal inconsistency in anthropic.mdx, and added missing description fields to 53 ai-transition-model pages."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-02-18",
      "branch": "claude/audit-webpage-errors-X4jHg",
      "title": "Audit wiki pages for factual errors and hallucinations",
      "summary": "Systematic audit of ~20 wiki pages for factual errors, hallucinations, and inconsistencies. Found and fixed 25+ confirmed errors across 17 pages, including wrong dates, fabricated statistics, false attributions, missing major events, broken entity references, misattributed techniques, and internal inconsistencies."
    }
  ],
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 8,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 43,
      "diagrams": 4,
      "internalLinks": 86,
      "externalLinks": 54,
      "footnotes": 32,
      "references": 32
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 23,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 90,
      "externalLinks": 12,
      "footnotes": 56,
      "references": 51,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "llmSummary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "green",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "amber",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "amber",
      "footnotes": "green",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "editHistoryCount": 2,
    "ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:6.8 A:6.2 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 214,
  "researchRank": 463,
  "recommendedScore": 235.11
}
External Links
{
  "wikipedia": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_warfare",
  "eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/global-catastrophic-biological-risk",
  "eightyK": "https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/preventing-catastrophic-pandemics/",
  "grokipedia": "https://grokipedia.com/page/Biological_warfare"
}
Backlinks (33)
idtitletyperelationship
misuse-risksAI Misuse Risk Cruxescrux
bioweapons-attack-chainBioweapons Attack Chain Modelanalysisrelated
bioweapons-ai-upliftAI Uplift Assessment Modelanalysisrelated
bioweapons-timelineAI-Bioweapons Timeline Modelanalysisrelated
marc-andreessenMarc Andreessen (AI Investor)person
compute-governanceCompute Governancepolicy
evalsAI Evaluationssafety-agenda
cyberweaponsCyberweapons Riskrisk
proliferationAI Proliferationrisk
large-language-modelsLarge Language Modelsconcept
scientific-researchScientific Research Capabilitiescapability
mainstream-eraMainstream Era (2020-Present)historical
__index__/knowledge-baseKnowledge Baseconcept
capability-threshold-modelCapability Threshold Modelanalysis
risk-activation-timelineRisk Activation Timeline Modelanalysis
blueprint-biosecurityBlueprint Biosecurityorganization
frontier-model-forumFrontier Model Forumorganization
securebioSecureBioorganization
max-tegmarkMax Tegmarkperson
toby-ordToby Ordperson
ai-safety-institutesAI Safety Institutespolicy
anthropic-core-viewsAnthropic Core Viewssafety-agenda
capability-unlearningCapability Unlearning / Removalapproach
evaluationAI Evaluationapproach
lab-cultureAI Lab Safety Cultureapproach
red-teamingRed Teamingapproach
refusal-trainingRefusal Trainingapproach
responsible-scaling-policiesResponsible Scaling Policiespolicy
seoul-declarationSeoul AI Safety Summit Declarationpolicy
technical-researchTechnical AI Safety Researchcrux
thresholdsCompute Thresholdspolicy
__index__/knowledge-base/risksAI Risksconcept
misuse-overviewMisuse Risks (Overview)concept
Longterm Wiki