Back
RAND Provides Objective Research Services and Public Policy Analysis
webCredibility Rating
4/5
High(4)High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: RAND Corporation
RAND Corporation's homepage serves as an entry point to a large body of policy-relevant research on AI governance, national security, and emerging technology risks, useful as a reference for policymakers and researchers in the AI safety space.
Metadata
Importance: 45/100homepage
Summary
RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and policy recommendations across a wide range of topics including national security, technology, governance, and emerging risks. It produces influential studies on AI policy, cybersecurity, and global governance challenges. RAND's work is frequently cited by governments and policymakers worldwide.
Key Points
- •RAND is a leading think tank producing nonpartisan research on policy, security, and technology issues relevant to AI governance.
- •Publishes reports on AI risk, autonomous systems, cybersecurity, and national security implications of emerging technologies.
- •Provides analysis used by U.S. government, military, and international policymakers for decision-making.
- •Conducts scenario planning and risk assessment relevant to existential and catastrophic risk from advanced technologies.
- •Offers publicly accessible research reports, datasets, and policy briefs on AI safety and governance topics.
Review
RAND's research highlights the emerging challenges and potential risks associated with artificial intelligence, particularly focusing on its psychological and security dimensions. Their recent work, such as the study on AI-induced psychosis, demonstrates a proactive approach to understanding the complex interactions between advanced AI systems and human cognition. The organization's methodology appears to be centered on comprehensive, objective policy analysis that bridges technological understanding with practical implications for governance and security. By examining issues like AI's potential to induce or amplify psychological disturbances, RAND contributes valuable insights to the broader AI safety discourse, helping policymakers anticipate and mitigate potential risks before they become critical threats.
Cited by 19 pages
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Large Language Models | Concept | 62.0 |
| AI Misuse Risk Cruxes | Crux | 65.0 |
| AI Safety Solution Cruxes | Crux | 65.0 |
| AGI Development | -- | 52.0 |
| AI Risk Portfolio Analysis | Analysis | 64.0 |
| Capabilities-to-Safety Pipeline Model | Analysis | 73.0 |
| AI Compounding Risks Analysis Model | Analysis | 60.0 |
| AI Risk Interaction Matrix | Analysis | 65.0 |
| AI Risk Interaction Network Model | Analysis | 64.0 |
| AI Risk Warning Signs Model | Analysis | 70.0 |
| Alignment Research Center (ARC) | Organization | 57.0 |
| OpenAI | Organization | 62.0 |
| Holden Karnofsky | Person | 40.0 |
| Toby Ord | Person | 41.0 |
| AI Control | Research Area | 75.0 |
| AI Governance Coordination Technologies | Approach | 91.0 |
| AI Governance and Policy | Crux | 66.0 |
| AI Authoritarian Tools | Risk | 91.0 |
| Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Risk | 53.0 |
1 FactBase fact citing this source
| Entity | Property | Value | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAND Corporation AI Policy Research | Website | https://www.rand.org/ | — |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 6, 20264 KB
RAND Provides Objective Research Services and Public Policy Analysis | RAND
Skip to page content
RAND Provides Objective Research Services and Public Policy Analysis
The Latest from RAND
Expert Insights
Protecting Security in Science and Technology Research
Mar 31, 2026
Research Summary
Improving the Coast Guard's Waterways Safety Risk Assessment Tools
Mar 23, 2026
Commentary
What Options Does the U.S. Have in Iran?
RAND's Raphael Cohen argues that the war has already succeeded in setting the Iranian threat back, and the United States retains multiple pathways forward. The real question is how much more risk should Washington accept—and over what time frame.
Apr 4, 2026
Commentary
Making Housing Affordable: Q&A with Jason Ward
Mar 25, 2026
Research Summary
China's Aging Population and What It Means for Security
Mar 12, 2026
The right research can change the world for the better.
That's why RAND is committed to solving the world's most consequential policy problems.
Learn more
Featured Research
Research
Strategic Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence
Mar 10, 2026
Expert Insights
China's National Security Decisionmaking
Feb 25, 2026
Research
Educator Turnover Stabilizes After the Pandemic
Teacher and principal retirements and resignations in the United States continue to decline from their peak during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Still, teacher turnover remains elevated in urban districts.
Mar 24, 2026
By the Numbers
67% of students say that using AI for schoolwork harms critical thinking.
Learn More
23% of U.S. adults support the legal use of psilocybin “magic” mushrooms.
Learn More
Subscribe to the
Policy Currents Newsletter
See all newsletters
Get the latest RAND research and timely insights from our experts—delivered right to your inbox.
See all newsletters
Stay Informed
Get updates from RAND delivered straight to your inbox.
Email
Subscribe
Expert Insights
[The Artemis program] is huge, it is historic. But it's also important that it is not a flags-and-footprint thing anymore. We have the technology, we should have the management capability and the political will to make it something that lasts beyond just a handful of missions.
Jan Osburg
Senior Engineer, RAND
Source: The Christian Science Monitor
People need to grow up with critical thinking skills and ability to interpret, ability to analyze information to make an informed deci
... (truncated, 4 KB total)Resource ID:
0a17f30e99091ebf | Stable ID: sid_MMGkUOC1Vg