Dangerous Capability Evaluations
paperAuthors
Credibility Rating
Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.
Rating inherited from publication venue: arXiv
Data Status
Abstract
To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evaluations and pilot them on Gemini 1.0 models. Our evaluations cover four areas: (1) persuasion and deception; (2) cyber-security; (3) self-proliferation; and (4) self-reasoning. We do not find evidence of strong dangerous capabilities in the models we evaluated, but we flag early warning signs. Our goal is to help advance a rigorous science of dangerous capability evaluation, in preparation for future models.
Cited by 2 pages
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Mesa-Optimization Risk Analysis | Analysis | 61.0 |
| Dangerous Capability Evaluations | Approach | 64.0 |
daec8c61ea79836b | Stable ID: NmNkMTZkZT