Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki

Situational Awareness

situational-awarenesscapabilityPath: /knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness/
E282Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page30 backlinksQuality: 67Updated: 2026-02-20
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "situational-awareness",
  "wikiId": "E282",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness.mdx",
  "title": "Situational Awareness",
  "quality": 67,
  "readerImportance": 91.5,
  "researchImportance": 93,
  "tacticalValue": 70,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-02-20",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Comprehensive analysis of situational awareness in AI systems, documenting that Claude 3 Opus fakes alignment 12% baseline (78% post-RL), 5 of 6 frontier models demonstrate scheming capabilities, and top models score 54% on SAD benchmark vs 90.7% human baseline. Linear probes achieve >99% AUROC for sleeper agent detection, while anti-scheming training reduces rates from 8.7% to 0.3%.",
  "description": "AI systems' understanding of their own nature and circumstances, studied as a capability that may enable context-dependent behavior including strategic deception.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 5.2,
    "rigor": 6.8,
    "completeness": 7.1,
    "actionability": 6.5
  },
  "category": "capabilities",
  "subcategory": "safety-relevant",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 3607,
    "tableCount": 8,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 33,
    "externalLinks": 8,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0,
    "sectionCount": 14,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 3607,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "NeurIPS 2024",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04694",
      "resourceId": "0d2f34967709af2a",
      "resourceTitle": "Me, Myself, and AI: SAD Benchmark"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic Dec 2024",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-faking",
      "resourceId": "c2cfd72baafd64a9",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic's 2024 alignment faking study"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research found",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/claude-sonnet-37-often-knows-when-its-in-alignment-evaluations/",
      "resourceId": "f5ef9e486e36fbee",
      "resourceTitle": "Apollo Research found"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research found",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/claude-sonnet-37-often-knows-when-its-in-alignment-evaluations/",
      "resourceId": "f5ef9e486e36fbee",
      "resourceTitle": "Apollo Research found"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 5,
  "convertedLinkCount": 14,
  "backlinkCount": 30,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 55,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "capability",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 23,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "scheming",
        "title": "Scheming",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/scheming/",
        "similarity": 23
      },
      {
        "id": "sandbagging",
        "title": "AI Capability Sandbagging",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/sandbagging/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "treacherous-turn",
        "title": "Treacherous Turn",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/treacherous-turn/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "instrumental-convergence",
        "title": "Instrumental Convergence",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/instrumental-convergence/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "sharp-left-turn",
        "title": "Sharp Left Turn",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/sharp-left-turn/",
        "similarity": 20
      }
    ]
  },
  "changeHistory": [
    {
      "date": "2026-02-18",
      "branch": "claude/fix-issue-240-N5irU",
      "title": "Surface tacticalValue in /wiki table and score 53 pages",
      "summary": "Added `tacticalValue` to `ExploreItem` interface, `getExploreItems()` mappings, the `/wiki` explore table (new sortable \"Tact.\" column), and the card view sort dropdown. Scored 49 new pages with tactical values (4 were already scored), bringing total to 53.",
      "model": "sonnet-4",
      "duration": "~30min"
    }
  ],
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 8,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 14,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 29,
      "externalLinks": 18,
      "footnotes": 11,
      "references": 11
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 8,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 33,
      "externalLinks": 8,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 12,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "green",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "amber",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "editHistoryCount": 1,
    "ratingsString": "N:5.2 R:6.8 A:6.5 C:7.1"
  },
  "readerRank": 12,
  "researchRank": 13,
  "recommendedScore": 184.35
}
External Links

No external links

Backlinks (30)
idtitletyperelationship
accident-risksAI Accident Risk Cruxescrux—
deceptive-alignment-decompositionDeceptive Alignment Decomposition Modelanalysisprerequisite
scheming-likelihood-modelScheming Likelihood Assessmentanalysisprerequisite
apollo-researchApollo Researchorganization—
emergent-capabilitiesEmergent Capabilitiesrisk—
sandbaggingAI Capability Sandbaggingrisk—
schemingSchemingrisk—
sleeper-agentsSleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMsrisk—
__index__/knowledge-base/capabilitiesAI Capabilitiesconcept—
long-horizonLong-Horizon Autonomous Taskscapability—
agi-developmentAGI Developmentconcept—
alignment-robustness-trajectoryAlignment Robustness Trajectoryanalysis—
capability-threshold-modelCapability Threshold Modelanalysis—
corrigibility-failure-pathwaysCorrigibility Failure Pathwaysanalysis—
mesa-optimization-analysisMesa-Optimization Risk Analysisanalysis—
model-organisms-of-misalignmentModel Organisms of Misalignmentanalysis—
risk-activation-timelineRisk Activation Timeline Modelanalysis—
technical-pathwaysTechnical Pathway Decompositionanalysis—
arcAlignment Research Center (ARC)organization—
frontier-model-forumFrontier Model Forumorganization—
matsMATS ML Alignment Theory Scholars programorganization—
situational-awareness-lpSituational Awareness LPorganization—
leopold-aschenbrennerLeopold Aschenbrennerperson—
evaluationAI Evaluationapproach—
red-teamingRed Teamingresearch-area—
ai-welfareAI Welfare and Digital Mindsconcept—
deceptive-alignmentDeceptive Alignmentrisk—
goal-misgeneralizationGoal Misgeneralizationrisk—
power-seekingPower-Seeking AIrisk—
treacherous-turnTreacherous Turnrisk—