GovAI

government

Centre for the Governance of AI·governance.ai/

Credibility Rating

4/5

High(4)

High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.

Rating inherited from publication venue: Centre for the Governance of AI

Data Status

Full text fetchedFetched Dec 28, 2025

Summary

A research organization focused on understanding AI's societal impacts, governance challenges, and policy implications across various domains like workforce, infrastructure, and public perception.

Key Points

•Focuses on technical AI governance and policy research
•Examines public attitudes and potential societal impacts of AI
•Investigates governmental roles in AI infrastructure and safety

Review

GovAI represents a critical research initiative examining the intersection of artificial intelligence, public policy, and societal implications. Their work spans multiple critical areas including technical AI governance, public attitudes toward AI technologies, and potential governmental roles in AI infrastructure development. The organization appears to take a comprehensive approach to AI safety, investigating not just technical challenges but also broader socioeconomic implications. By exploring topics like AI's impact on labor markets, agent infrastructure, and public perceptions, GovAI provides nuanced insights that could help policymakers and researchers develop more holistic strategies for responsible AI development. Their research seems particularly valuable in bridging technical understanding with practical policy considerations, potentially helping to shape proactive and informed governance frameworks for emerging AI technologies.

Cited by 17 pages

Page	Type	Quality
Long-Horizon Autonomous Tasks	Capability	65.0
AI Safety Solution Cruxes	Crux	65.0
AI Safety Defense in Depth Model	Analysis	69.0
International AI Coordination Game Model	Analysis	59.0
AI Safety Intervention Effectiveness Matrix	Analysis	73.0
Intervention Timing Windows	Analysis	72.0
Mesa-Optimization Risk Analysis	Analysis	61.0
AI Safety Researcher Gap Model	Analysis	67.0
Alignment Research Center	Organization	57.0
Conjecture	Organization	37.0
GovAI	Organization	43.0
Survival and Flourishing Fund	Organization	59.0
Dario Amodei	Person	41.0
AI Governance and Policy	Crux	66.0
Pause / Moratorium	Policy	72.0
Compute Thresholds	Policy	91.0
Governance-Focused Worldview	Concept	67.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Feb 26, 20264 KB

### OUR WORK HAS BEEN FEATURED IN:

[![MIT Technology Review](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/6644b8bea66726eff5edb1e7_furtune.svg)](https://fortune.com/2024/04/04/ai-training-costs-how-much-is-too-much-openai-gpt-anthropic-microsoft/)[![The Economist](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/6988954d3b7bb8b3fce40bf7_6179e1a7c2655a9e1d20501c_002.webp)](https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2023/06/21/the-bigger-is-better-approach-to-ai-is-running-out-of-road)[![Foreign Affairs](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/6644b95d1edac902eb2b1f39_fp.svg)](https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/10/19/biden-china-semiconductor-chip-industry-regulations-sanctions/)[![Financial Times](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/6988953ba8757569ee081e21_6179e1a72b87da8334bdebf7_004.webp)](https://www.ft.com/content/03895dc4-a3b7-481e-95cc-336a524f2ac2)[![New York Times](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/6644b9df570720ee62c0b172_The_Atlantic_magazine_logo.svg)](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/10/technology-exports-ai-programs-regulations-china/675605/)

### Stay in touch

#### Sign up to receive our annual report and rare updates about programmes and opportunities

#### Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

![](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f715e7e40c791/69888d74f16fb280af74b0c8_6179df588c0f6d34998a47ce_(HOMEPAGE).webp)

# Featured Analysis and Updates

[**Economics**\\
\\
**Export Controls and Export Promotion**\\
\\
Washington has made it clear that retaining AI dominance over China is both an economic and national security imperative. In November 2024, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission recommended...](https://www.governance.ai/research-paper/export-controls-and-export-promotion)

[![](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/614b70a71b9f71c9c240c7a7/690541056468c44246643969_GovAI%20On%20Blue.jpg)\\
\\
**Survey Research**\\
\\
**What Does the Public Think About AI?**\\
\\
Drawing from academic studies and public polling data, this report synthesises public attitudes towards AI with a focus on the United Kingdom and United States. It discusses public views on issues such as concern about job loss...](https://www.governance.ai/research-paper/what-does-the-public-think-about-ai)

[**Technical AI Governance**\\
\\
**Trends in Frontier AI Model Count: A Forecast to 2028**\\
\\
Governments are starting to impose requirements on AI models based on how much compute was used to train them. For example, the EU AI Act imposes...](https://www.governance.ai/research-paper/trends-in-frontier-ai-model-count-a-forecast-to-2028)

[**Research Posts**\\
\\
**Predicting AI’s Impact on Work**\\
\\
If policymakers could foresee how AI will impact labour markets, they could make better policy decisions. The nascent science of “automation evaluations” aims

... (truncated, 4 KB total)

Resource ID: f35c467b353f990f | Stable ID: YTgxMDMzYT