Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Updated 2026-04-08HistoryData
Page StatusDocumentation
Edited 3 days ago391 words1 backlinks
Content2/13
SummaryScheduleEntityEdit historyOverview
Tables2/ ~2Diagrams0Int. links12/ ~3Ext. links0/ ~2Footnotes0/ ~2References0/ ~1Quotes0Accuracy0Backlinks1

Verification & Source-Checking

What this is

Verification is how we keep facts on the wiki correct. There are several overlapping systems:

  • Citation verification — does each footnote URL still resolve, and does the cited source actually support the claim?
  • Source-checking — for FactBase facts and wiki page claims, does the cited source contain the asserted value?
  • Hallucination risk — per-page confidence scoring based on citation density, claim type, and source quality.
  • Audits — full-page review pipelines that can propose or apply fixes.
When to start here

A page says "Anthropic raised $4B in 2024" and you want to know whether that's actually true according to its citation? This is the hub.

Live dashboards

DashboardWhat it shows
Entity Source ChecksVerdict counts (confirmed/contradicted/undecidable) per FactBase entity
Citation AccuracyPer-citation accuracy scores from claim-vs-source LLM checks
Citation ContentCitation metadata: title/content availability, broken URLs
Hallucination RiskPer-page and wiki-wide risk scores
Source Check CoverageCoverage by record type and entity type

CLI playbook

# Citation verification (per page or wiki-wide)
pnpm crux w citations verify anthropic                    # Verify one page
pnpm crux w citations verify --all --limit=20             # Verify top 20 pages
pnpm crux w citations status anthropic                    # Show sourcing verdicts
pnpm crux w citations report                              # Wiki-wide summary
pnpm crux w citations report --broken                     # List broken citations

# Claim accuracy checks (does the source support the claim?)
pnpm crux w citations check-accuracy anthropic            # Check one page
pnpm crux w citations check-accuracy --all                # Batch
pnpm crux w citations fix-inaccuracies --apply            # Apply fix proposals

# Full audit pipeline (extract → verify → propose fixes)
pnpm crux w citations audit anthropic                     # Audit one page
pnpm crux w citations audit anthropic --apply             # Audit + auto-fix
pnpm crux w citations audit-check anthropic --threshold=0.9  # Independent check (no DB writes)

# Wiki-page sourcing (prose claims → cited footnotes)
pnpm crux w sourcing-wiki-pages --page=anthropic
pnpm crux w sourcing-wiki-pages --dry-run             # Preview
pnpm crux w sourcing-wiki-pages --budget=5            # With budget cap

# FactBase fact sourcing (structured facts → cited URLs)
pnpm crux fb sourcing --entity=anthropic              # Check one entity's facts
pnpm crux fb sourcing --dry-run --limit=5             # Preview

# Hallucination risk
pnpm crux query risk anthropic                            # Score for one page
pnpm crux query risk --level=high --limit=20              # Top 20 risky pages

When to use what

I want to...RunOr check
Find broken citation URLs across the wikipnpm crux w citations report --brokenCitation Content dashboard
See which pages have unsupported claimspnpm crux w citations check-accuracy --allCitation Accuracy dashboard
Identify pages that need human reviewpnpm crux query risk --level=highHallucination Risk dashboard
Verify a specific page end-to-endpnpm crux w citations audit <page>
Verify FactBase facts for one entitypnpm crux fb sourcing --entity=<id>Entity Source Checks dashboard
Re-check claims that previously failedAdd --recheck to verify/check-accuracy commands
Auto-apply proposed citation fixespnpm crux w citations fix-inaccuracies --apply
Understand the verification tier modelContent Verification Tiers

Verdict types

Source-check produces three verdicts for each claim/fact:

  • confirmed — the cited source contains text that supports the claim
  • contradicted — the cited source contains text that contradicts the claim
  • undecidable — the source doesn't address the claim (irrelevant, paywalled, broken, or ambiguous)

The dashboards group by these verdicts so you can prioritize: contradicted > undecidable > re-verify confirmed.

Architecture & deep dives

  • Content Verification Tiers — verification standards by page type (biographical > analytical > exploratory), inspired by Wikipedia BLP
  • Citation Architecture — five overlapping citation systems (footnotes, References, CitationOverlay, ResourceLink, KB fact refs)
  • crux/lib/sourcing/ — orchestrator, LLM checker, verdict handler, source parsers
  • crux/citations/ — verify-citations, citation-status, check-accuracy
  • apps/wiki-server/src/routes/sourcing/ — RPC endpoints for verdict storage